Saturday, January 19, 2013

Magnolia (1999)

Director: Paul Thomas Anderson                   Writer: Paul Thomas Anderson
Film Score: Jon Brion                                   Cinematography: Robert Elswit
Starring: Julianne Moore, William H. Macey, John C. Reilly and Tom Cruise

This is the kind of movie that makes me despair. Critics love it, though I don’t know why, because it smacks to me of the same kind of pretentious, self-indulgence that you find in modern literature these days. Mercifully, Magnolia was snubbed at the Oscars that year. The thing is, when you come right down to it, the substance of this film is no different than the vacuous plots and characters that you find in the big-budget action movies. The only difference is, instead of fists and blood, we have anger issues and profanity. Who wants to watch that? I sure don’t. And if I ever do, I can watch Jerry Springer for free.

What Anderson is attempting to do, I suspect, is to illuminate what it means to be a man and a woman and a child in our modern society, what it means to be human. But he undercuts his meaning with a prologue that emphasizes some connection between the disparate stories, when that doesn’t really seem to be the point. By far the biggest problem, however, is that he drowns the entire production in faux sentiment. Just because people cry, doesn’t mean you’re seeing real emotion. Just because they’re screaming the f-word with every other breath, doesn’t mean they’re being profound. In fact, the emphasis on profanity to punctuate every heightened emotion only does the opposite and dumbs the whole thing down. And add to that the “drama” of death. Josef Stalin said that when one person dies, it’s a tragedy, but when a million people die, it’s a statistic. Well, Magnolia is a statistic.

None of the actors really looks comfortable (i.e. real) probably because there’s no plot, just a spewing forth of raw emotion. Each has a character, but no real purpose within the film except to eventually cross paths. I could tell you who they all are, but that’s all there is to them and so there wouldn’t be much point in watching the film. By far the worse choice of casting is Julianne Moore, who has about as much emotional expression as a trick-or-treater wearing a rubber mask. She cries, but she doesn’t shed a tear. She twists her mouth into agony, but then it flops back immediately to boredom. I half expect to see her reading her lines off cue cards at any moment. It’s that bad. And that’s saying something, considering how bad Tom Cruise is. It’s like watching a really bad acting class with an equally bad director shouting at the actors to, “Emote! Emote!”

Jon Brion’s score, as well as the rest of the soundtrack, is engineered louder than the dialogue, which I guess is supposed to be edgy, but just winds up being annoying. Then there’s the song that every character sings along with as the camera skips around to the various story lines. The whole exercise is simply forced and unconvincing in its entirety. About the only entertaining scene in the entire film is when it starts raining frogs (yep, that’s not a typo). The film, I’m sure, is trying to be new, different, avant garde, but in the end Magnolia winds up being a three-hour train wreck. We watch it not because we like it, but because we can’t believe how horrific it is. The only thing missing is a voice-over crying out, “Oh, the humanity!”

15 comments:

  1. Ugh, I hated this movie. It's another one of those that was hailed by critics and was completely over my head. Beside the fact that Tom Cruise was in it, I have completely blanked this movie from my memory. The only thing I remember about it is its sheer awfulness. Loved your review, though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with everything you said. Just watched it and I could not believe how terrible it was. One of the worst I've ever seen. Give me a cheesy rom com over this pretentious, over raught stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tom Cruise has always been a horrific role model for kids and teens. His profanity laced movies are abhorrent. Sexual themes as well. Magnolia was beyond abhorrent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Roger, couldn't agree more. I'm still mystified by all the critics who raved about how "great" this film is.

      Delete
  4. boy the ending with all the characters singing that stupid song.. BAD TASTE

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was hoping it would all tie together in the end, trying to guess the ending thinking they would all die in a massive ten car pile up at the intersection in the rain, unfortunately they didn’t. Now that would’ve been satisfying.
    That shit music was louder than the dialogue and just droned on irritatingly through the whole thing. Hated it (but don’t tell my girlfriend she loves it)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wanted to like it because I like weird artistic movies that everyone else hates but it was so BAD! I hated all of it. I kept waiting for it to get better and it didn’t.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I had the MISFORTUNE of running across it July of 2020 when I'm writing this. This movie is just a dark mind f. It follows NO PLOT except the INDIVIDUAL story lines that are ALL OVER THE FREAKING PLACE and it's like EVERY CHARACTER IN THAT SHOW IS ON THE EDGE OF A NERVOUS FREAKING BREAKDOWN! It's TRULY like watching a train wreck. I have no idea why the damn channel is STILL on it. I want to see if there is ANY redeeming quality in this thing. Which I have come to the conclusion is NO. IT'S JUST DARK EMOTIONAL CHAOS. I am about a hour and a half lost on it.

    A waste.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, horrible movie. Kicking myself for wasting 3 hours of my life for frog rain. WTAF ! Critics likes this crap ? Horribly acted. Horrible story lines, very pointless.

      Delete
  8. Also a bunch of heavy breathing and grunting. And overacting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Definitely the worst movie for all actors in that cast. Think about it there's several big names and it's by far the worst work any of them have ever done. We can blame it on the script but like someone commented above, everybody was overacting big time. Not to feel good movie and not one likeable character in it. Not much else to say other than just awful

    ReplyDelete
  10. The most incomprehensible movie I’ve ever watched and I watched quite a few ‘artistic’ movies. There was no storyline even though the first 5 minutes of the movie were hinting at some odds defying tie up in the end, there was none. A lot of famous actors and not a single powerful performance. Quite a few scenes were of the type ‘what the F just happened here’. The frogs falling from the sky were supposed to be a catharsis of sort, but for what? Magnolia was the movie that left more questions then answers and not in a good sense. 3 hours wasted over 3 evenings (so boring it was that it’s almost impossible to bear it in one sitting). And yet, it has high RottenTomato rating.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Perhaps it's possible that any movie that so utter fails it's intention is considered ground breaking to bored critics. IDK. But the raining frogs in this film had it better then the viewer of this three hour middle finger to cinema.

    ReplyDelete