Monday, January 7, 2013

The Manchurian Candidate (1962)

Director: John Frankenheimer                       Writer: George Axelrod
Film Score: David Amram                             Cinematography: Lionel Lindon
Starring: Frank Sinatra, Laurence Harvey, Janet Leigh and Angela Lansbury

In my review of Round Midnight, I talked about how films from the 80s seemed dated, but that’s nothing compared to films from the 60s. If I had to say why I would probably attribute it to the film itself. Films from the 60s have a crisper, live look, similar to what video taped television had the past few decades, or digital film has now. Without the softening effect of previous film stock the sets and consumes look more artificial, cleaner, less real. And, like the 80s, the clothing and hairstyles from the 60s seem more of an aberration that even those from the 70s.

The Manchurian Candidate is no exception. It has that cheap, spare look that you get in black and white television from the period. A continuation of the Communist paranoia that appears in films like Stalag 17 and Invasion of the Body Snatchers, it concerns a plot by Soviet and Chinese agents to brainwash American soldiers captured during the Korean War and turn them loose as killing machines back in the United States, with no memories or remorse. So far, so good, until the members of the unit who had been brainwashed begin remembering what had actually happened to them.

I suppose you had to be alive at the time to see someone like Frank Sinatra as a serious actor instead of the caricature of himself that he became in his later years (can anyone forget Joe Piscopo singing “Ebony and Ivory” with Eddie Murphy?). The usual cast of sixties character actors (who would later become 70s sit-com character actors) is onboard, James Gregory, Henry Silva, Lloyd Corrigan, John McGiver and the like. Janet Leigh, fresh out of her success in Hitchcock’s Psycho, makes an improbably love interest for Sinatra, while Angela Lansbury has probably one of her best roles, as the scheming mother of Laurence Harvey, the primary soldier who was brainwashed. But the film really only starts to pick up with the appearance of Leslie Parrish who is absolutely stunning in her brief role as Harvey’s pre-war girlfriend.

Is The Manchurian Candidate a bad movie? On the whole . . . yes. It’s certainly nowhere near the brilliance of other 60s films like The Hustler, or The Great Escape. Sinatra is just as bad here as he was in From Here to Eternity and from a distance of sixty years looking back the whole thing looks like any ordinary TV drama of the day. Particularly overdrawn and cliché are the Soviet agent and the Chinese doctor who, never mind the fact that they appear to be working together in complete harmony, really undermine the believability of their scheme by their overblown characterizations. Still, the ending is satisfying and, although the drama was diluted, it finishes strong and is worth watching

4 comments:

  1. I guess it had to happen -- the first movie I've come across here where we disagree. The first time I saw The Manchurian Candidate, I was around 26 years old -- it was right after it was re-released. I knew it was a BIG THING, but I really just didn't get it. More recently, though, I've seen it several times, and I appreciate it more every time. I think it's really great -- the performances, the script, and the ending leave me breathless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shadows,

      Thanks for all of the comments. I think my response to this film might have to go through the same evolution as yours did. The similar thing happened to me with Shaft. The first time I saw it I hated it and when I went back to watch in again, in order to write it up for this blog, I realized that it wasn't bad. As far as this film, there are definitely some major problems with the villains and the production design for me, but it will be interesting to see how I feel going back to it later. Thanks again.

      Delete
  2. "Communist paranoia that appears in films like Stalag 17"
    Umm... what are you talking about? Communism isn't even mentioned in "Stalag 17." It's about Nazis. German people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A lot of historical films really reflect the time in which they were made more than the subject matter they are portraying. In the fifties, the fear of Communists was that they were in our midst, pretending to be loyal Americans but secretly working for the Russians. Peter Graves' character in Stalag 17 is the traitor in their midst, which represents the Communist scare of the time. Other films from the fifties do the same thing, like Invasion of the Body Snatchers or Spartacus.

    ReplyDelete